…Invocations. I can barely decode it, but I think it says “The Breaking of the Oaths”. Awe and intimidation tingle inside me. I’m about to interview the creator of a…
…vision of the Charitable Club changed from the initial idea into what it is now? Jason: It’s funny. Every time we try to pivot or be all things to all…
…in on and they all seem very obvious choices, yet somehow manage to not take certain aspects of the format into account. It’s as if they haven’t really played it…
…time to draw into an answer. The deck can sometimes get through all this interaction and cause a near standstill. We also have concerns about the implications of this type…
…have convoke, but it makes an army of creature tokens that you can then use to convoke it again. This has the potential to produce an absurdly large token army…
…a real. In multiplayer formats, like Oathbreaker the versatility and inherent politics of the format make the downside of the card almost non-existent. The equity of being able to answer…
…due to their mana cost. However, this card can be played the turn after Chandra without a land drop, thanks to her -2 ability. What’s the upside? It gives your…
…color identity. It lives in the command zone. You are only able to cast it if your Oathbreaker is on the battlefield under your control. It is also subject to…
…of the Veil [] and the like. I think about the decklist below as the “current iteration,” because I’m sure that improvements can be made. Maybe after more reps, we…
…that have abilities like Kozilek, the Great Distortion []. Also, keep in mind, the Eldrazi with Annihilator are problematic since they can sacrifice the Eldrazi to the Annihilator trigger. Phyrexian…