…Invocations. I can barely decode it, but I think it says “The Breaking of the Oaths”. Awe and intimidation tingle inside me. I’m about to interview the creator of a…
…vision of the Charitable Club changed from the initial idea into what it is now? Jason: It’s funny. Every time we try to pivot or be all things to all…
…in on and they all seem very obvious choices, yet somehow manage to not take certain aspects of the format into account. It’s as if they haven’t really played it…
…time to draw into an answer. The deck can sometimes get through all this interaction and cause a near standstill. We also have concerns about the implications of this type…
…a real. In multiplayer formats, like Oathbreaker the versatility and inherent politics of the format make the downside of the card almost non-existent. The equity of being able to answer…
…have convoke, but it makes an army of creature tokens that you can then use to convoke it again. This has the potential to produce an absurdly large token army…
…color identity. It lives in the command zone. You are only able to cast it if your Oathbreaker is on the battlefield under your control. It is also subject to…
…is the correct course of action. It would bring into question things like burning wish [] that we have already decided are not in the best interest of the format…
…important to note that inherent in their design, these three Chandra’s synergize directly with each other. They belong in each other’s 58. They are well designed to curve into each…
…not a lot of protection built into the deck. If you expect high levels of instant speed interaction, then cards like Flusterstorm [], Defense Grid [], or Teferi, Mage of…